[Tweeted 2011-06-06]
Living in an area where there are multiple casinos within a short drive or a long walk, I've learned to see some things using gaming metaphors. One of these metaphors is trust everyone at the table, but cut the cards anyway (Robert's Rule #18), and if you are an empiricist like Hume, then this rule will automatically make sense.
How does it apply to work? First, if you are not able to trust your colleagues, work (and probably life) will be miserable. Of course the reverse is also true; trusting your colleagues will go a long way in making work not be the worst part of your life. In fact, I've had some jobs I should have hated because they were such a poor fit and yet I didn't because of my colleagues.
Second, not only will the inability to trust your colleagues make life miserable, it will be very difficult to accomplish what you need to accomplish as well. The amount of time you spend countering the machinations of office politics in a hostile environment will outweigh whatever other successes you have. In addition, those times in which you don't succeed your discomfort will be worse because of the negative self-talk that comes out of the lack of trust and your assumptions about yourself.
Of course, this doesn't mean that you should just blindly trust. After all, your trust can be pretty easily misplaced, and this is your livelihood we're talking about here. You can't just go about willy-nilly assuming that everything your colleagues do and say is true, and even a series of lucky guesses ends sometime, which is a very good reason to confirm what you believe to be true.
Of course all of this is to say trust everyone at the table, but cut the cards anyway.
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away... I gave a lecture called Getting Paid to Think to an academic society. In it I presented a simple hypothesis - an education in the humanities and thinking (e.g., Philosophy) is more beneficial than a skill-based education (e.g., Computer Science). This blog is dedicated to getting you to think as I discuss a variety of topics, most of which are related to my career in the tech industry.
Showing posts with label directing others. Show all posts
Showing posts with label directing others. Show all posts
Friday, March 16, 2012
Thursday, March 1, 2012
When working with rock stars, get your M&Ms ready (Robert's Rule #6)
[Tweeted 2011-05-02]
Most managers I know claim that they would love to have a team of rock stars. Most of the time it's pretty clear that's because a team tends to make a manager look awesome (or not). It makes sense that managers would conclude that a team of rock stars would make the manager look like a rock star as well. Not all teams are comprised of rock stars though, and those that are tend not to maintain cohesion.
For a while I tried to determine why this is the case...why is it that a group of people, especially one where the majority is highly skilled, would spin apart after a period of cohesiveness. Here's what I've discovered: highly skilled people tend to not only be highly skilled but also have their own style, and everyone else's style is not as [insert your descriptor here]...and, simple as that, you find your rock star has become a diva, a word that has connotations beyond the "star" quality that it denotes.
There are two ways I've seen managers react to divas on their team:
Having been on both sides of this particular equation, allow me to share the following. Reacting by making sure the diva knows the manager is in charge will backfire. The manager may be in charge, but yanking a dragon's chain seldom ends well. At the very least, the rock star will become miserable and rebel, reducing team morale and in some cases the rebellion has resulted in political intrigue that results in the termination of one or more of the parties. Keep in mind that even as a manager, you're only in charge as long as you're actually employed and have employees reporting to you.
In contrast, one of my best managers, one who dealt with several highly skilled technical people, all with strong personalities, said her formula for success was to hire rock stars and stay out of their way. That she enjoyed the success of a team that delivered solid, feature-rich, complex products ahead of schedule and under budget with extremely low defect rates is a testament to the validity of her approach.
She didn't sweat the small stuff and made sure that her team was rewarded adequately, and most importantly, she made sure that even if she didn't initially understand the reason for a request, she tried to move towards honoring it at the same time that she sought to understand it because, as it turns out, rock stars tend to have very good reasons for seemingly odd-ball requests (one of the most famous examples).
All this led me to Robert's Rule #6: if you want your team to be rock stars, expect a few divas and get those M&Ms ready.
Most managers I know claim that they would love to have a team of rock stars. Most of the time it's pretty clear that's because a team tends to make a manager look awesome (or not). It makes sense that managers would conclude that a team of rock stars would make the manager look like a rock star as well. Not all teams are comprised of rock stars though, and those that are tend not to maintain cohesion.
For a while I tried to determine why this is the case...why is it that a group of people, especially one where the majority is highly skilled, would spin apart after a period of cohesiveness. Here's what I've discovered: highly skilled people tend to not only be highly skilled but also have their own style, and everyone else's style is not as [insert your descriptor here]...and, simple as that, you find your rock star has become a diva, a word that has connotations beyond the "star" quality that it denotes.
There are two ways I've seen managers react to divas on their team:
- they tighten control as much as they can, making sure the "diva" knows the manager is in charge
- they stay out of the way of the "diva" as much as possible, working behind the scenes to make sure the obstacles are cleared
Having been on both sides of this particular equation, allow me to share the following. Reacting by making sure the diva knows the manager is in charge will backfire. The manager may be in charge, but yanking a dragon's chain seldom ends well. At the very least, the rock star will become miserable and rebel, reducing team morale and in some cases the rebellion has resulted in political intrigue that results in the termination of one or more of the parties. Keep in mind that even as a manager, you're only in charge as long as you're actually employed and have employees reporting to you.
In contrast, one of my best managers, one who dealt with several highly skilled technical people, all with strong personalities, said her formula for success was to hire rock stars and stay out of their way. That she enjoyed the success of a team that delivered solid, feature-rich, complex products ahead of schedule and under budget with extremely low defect rates is a testament to the validity of her approach.
She didn't sweat the small stuff and made sure that her team was rewarded adequately, and most importantly, she made sure that even if she didn't initially understand the reason for a request, she tried to move towards honoring it at the same time that she sought to understand it because, as it turns out, rock stars tend to have very good reasons for seemingly odd-ball requests (one of the most famous examples).
All this led me to Robert's Rule #6: if you want your team to be rock stars, expect a few divas and get those M&Ms ready.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)